Like Owner, Like Dog: The Science Behind Why We Mirror Our Pets

TL;DR: Ever wondered why dogs and their owners seem so strikingly alike? It’s not just appearances—research reveals we often choose pets who look like us, and over time, our personalities, emotions, and even stress levels begin to align. This mutual mirroring runs deeper than you'd expect, influencing everything from behaviour to wellbeing.

###

We’ve all seen it—that uncanny moment when a shaggy-haired owner walks by with an equally shaggy dog, or when a sprightly, energetic jogger passes alongside a bouncy companion mirroring their every step. The resemblance between dogs and their humans is so common it’s become a cultural touchstone and an endless source of amusement.

But is there any truth behind this phenomenon? Science has plenty to say. The dog-human bond goes far deeper than mere appearance—it extends into personality, stress levels, and even the subtle emotional cues we exchange daily. Let’s explore what researchers have discovered about this intriguing connection.

In one study published in Psychological Science, researchers showed photographs of 45 dogs and their owners to 104 participants in a forced-choice task (one owner, two dogs—only one match). Participants correctly identified the owner’s dog 64% of the time for purebreds, suggesting people unconsciously select dogs that resemble themselves. The success rate dropped to 50% with mixed-breed dogs, which researchers attributed to the fact that mixed-breed puppies’ appearance at the time of adoption is less predictive of their adult form than that of purebred dogs. As a result, the grown dog may resemble the owner's original preference less clearly than in the case of purebreds.

Other studies too show our tastes in pets often reflect our own appearance. For instance, one study published in Anthrozoös, which is devoted to the interactions between people and other animals, found women with long hair rated lop-eared dogs (like Springer Spaniels and Beagles)—whose faces are framed similarly to the framing effect caused by long human hair—as more likeable, friendly, loyal, and intelligent than prick-eared breeds. Conversely, women with shorter hair preferred prick-eared breeds (such as Siberian Huskies and Basenjis), whose upright ears and unframed lower face more closely resemble people whose hair is short or pulled back.

Our choice of canine companion clearly isn’t random and goes beyond general appearance. A Japanese study extended previous research from Western and Latin American countries by examining whether participants could still match dog-owner pairs in a racially homogenous setting like Japan, where individual differences in facial features are less pronounced. Participants still identified real dog-owner pairs over fake ones with two-thirds accuracy.

In a follow-up study, Japanese students successfully matched owners and dogs 75% of the time when only the eyes were visible. When the eyes were obscured, accuracy fell below 50%, highlighting the crucial role eyes and gaze play in perceiving resemblance.

Moreover, this mirroring extends beyond appearance into personality. Research published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science found owners and their dogs score similarly on traits like extraversion, emotional stability, and conscientiousness. In another study published in iScience and involving over 2,700 pet owners, researchers discovered that higher neuroticism and poorer mental wellbeing in owners correlated with more anxious attachments to pets. Dogs exhibited increased fear-related behaviours in these scenarios, suggesting deep emotional co-regulation between owners and pets.

This emotional mirroring also extends to our biochemistry. Researchers analysing cortisol—a key stress hormone—in dog-human pairs found a strong correlation. In a study published in Scientific Reports, hair cortisol concentrations from 58 dog-human pairs were collected and analysed at two separate times, reflecting levels during the summer and winter months. The results showed that dogs closely mirrored their owners’ stress levels. Since neither physical activity nor training explained these similarities, researchers concluded that dogs likely reflect their humans' stress rather than vice versa.

All these findings suggest our connection with dogs is not only emotional but systemic—woven through patterns of behaviour, cognition, and physiology. What begins as a choice driven by unconscious preferences may deepen into a shared emotional reality, with dogs absorbing and reflecting our internal states over time until the lines between selection and synchronisation blur.

This brings us to the choices we make—for ourselves and our dogs. If you value transparency, quality, and simplicity in your food, extending these principles to your dog’s treats makes perfect sense. Choosing single-ingredient, human-grade treats isn’t simply indulgence. If our dogs truly mirror us, our choices resonate in their lives. So next time someone says your dog looks like you, take it as a compliment. They're glimpsing the shared life you've built—one meal, walk, and microbiome at a time.